LDJ Strategy &
Quick Actions Palette

Part 1: Prioritized new features for Launchpad's product roadmap through a Lightening Decision Jam (LDJ).

Part 2: As part of our first LDJ objective, I created the Quick Actions Palette to enhance operator navigation in Launchpad's web app.

Company

Launchpad

Timeline

Q2 to Q3 2023

Team

CEO

CTO

1 Designer (Me)

3 Engineers

Role

I led a LDJ strategy workshop, and owned the design part of the quick actions palette in the roadmap

Problem

The team at Launchpad had a lot of great ideas on how to improve existing and new features. However the scope of certain projects were too big to take on for a lean team, and so prioritization was a struggle.  

  1. Opportunity Cost: Taking on projects with large scope without customer impact were costly for a lean team 


  2. Conflicting prioritization: Multiple high priority items were detrimental to the output quality

"We don't have a clear vision on what problems to work on next"

-CEO

Goal

Align the team by identifying and prioritizing solutions for existing customer problems.

-80%

Less customer service calls

-50%

Time saved from strategy/ scoping meetings

7

User workflows with interactions

1 Defined Roadmap

Templated approach to define and prioritize future customer problems, enabling us to design targeted solutions effectively

Two Part Strategy

Launchpad’s product centers around 3 pillars: scheduling, payments, and communication.

For this workshop, we aimed to solve for scheduling issues with studio operators. Operators are individuals responsible for managing and overseeing the operations of a martial arts studio.

Part 1: Lightening Decision Jam (LDJ)

I prepared both the physical board for the in-person attendees and the Figjam board for our hybrid participants, and co-facilitated with the lead engineer to ensure features were technically feasible.

Starting with a broad scale view of the app

Since it was our first team workshop, I aimed for a broad perspective, seeking perspectives about operators from various team members. During the brainstorming session, we noted:

  • Positives: Operators found AI particularly useful for communication, and the schedule and calendar view were highly intuitive.


  • Friction Areas: However, operators struggled with event navigation throughout the app, compounded by inconsistencies in naming conventions.

How might we reduce the number of clicks on the most common operator workflows?

As the LDJ was meant to establish the roadmap's direction, we opted to identify three opportunity areas instead of just one. This approach allowed us to effectively plan for our short, medium, and long-term objectives. For brevity, I'll concentrate on the first opportunity area.

Provide operators with immediate access to frequently used actions, and accelerate their workflows

The quick actions palette came out as the winning solution as it benefits the operator with a more accessible way to navigate their most common actions, and resolve findability issues we've identified in the design audit.

Part II: Designing in Phases

Part II: Designing a New Feature in Phases

An expandable agenda with action buttons that adapt to individual user behavior over time

Given that this was a new feature, I designed the operator palette in stages, considering what we know about our customers today and their expected usage once it's implemented. Each version was aligned with the changing needs of operators to ensure it's practical.

Take

Attendance

Collect

Payment

Add

Person

Schedule

Trial

Book

Appointment

Issue

Membership

Add to

Class

Send

Email

V0: MVP Assumptions

CTAs were identified on what we think is the most common workflows from past customer calls and analyzing app usage (Posthog)

Quick Actions

Collect Payment

Schedule Trial Class

Take Attendance

Enroll Member

Add a Person

Send an Email

V1: General usage

After 1 month of usage, CTAs will be distilled and re-identified based on what is most commonly used across all operators

V2: Customized usage

After 3 months of usage, each action item will be changed dynamically based on individual's usage for a more customized approach.

Tradeoffs: Dialogue Box vs Full Screen Overlay

My engineers and I discussed the use of dialogue boxes for context-focused experiences and full-screen overlays for immersive, task-specific interactions. We ultimately adopting a hybrid approach for user flow continuity and focused experiences as needed.

Taking Attendance Flow

Adding a Person Flow

Adding to Class Flow

Issue a Membership Flow

Adding subsequent versions to ur roadmap

The LDJ workshop proved instrumental in shaping our product roadmap, laying the foundation for planned features, as well as generated a templated approach to define and prioritize for future customer problems.

As for the palette, we introduced the quick actions palette in its V0 MVP stage, with plans for iterative improvements in V2 and V3, contingent upon user feedback.

Sample representation (not actual roadmap)

Sample representation (not actual roadmap)

Let's Work Together

Let's Work Together

Let's Work Together